The decision-making procedures of The United Church of Canada are governed by: 1) the by-laws as stated in The Manual; and b), as noted in The Manual Appendix, Section 3.7:
“In any point not covered in The Manual, the parliamentary rules accepted in Canada (Bourinot’s Rules) will be followed.”
Both The Manual and Bourinot’s Rules are silent on the use of an in camera session by a decisionmaking body.
Bourinot’s Rules refer to “a committee of the whole”, a process by which a decision-making body sets aside the regular rules of parliamentary procedure to allow for a freer and fuller consideration of a matter. This changes how a topic is addressed but not who is present for the topic to be addressed. In recent years, the church has regularly employed a three-fold approach to business—learning, discussing, deciding—in which only the final stage involves parliamentary procedure. This has provided for the type of discussion that previously required a motion to move into a committee of the whole.
In the section on “Rules for Usages and Assemblies Generally”, Bourinot’s Rules note that some special motions which have come to be in use are not drawn from Canadian parliamentary practice and should be accepted only if there has been general prior agreement to their use and effect. The use of in camera sessions would fall within this. There is no stated agreement as to when it is appropriate to use an in camera session and what the practice of decision-making associated with it should be.
As with “a committee of the whole”, an in camera session can provide an opportunity for a fuller and freer discussion of a topic. What distinguishes an “in camera” session is that it is only open to the voting members of the decision-making body and any resource people they elect to include.
Clear guidelines on in camera sessions will help protect the practice from abuse, ensure required procedures are followed, and safeguard the transparency of decision-making in the councils of the church.
Because the standard for this is not set by Bourinot’s Rules, the church needs to clarify: 1) What are justifiable reasons for moving in camera? and 2) Are decisions able to be made in camera, provided the rules for quorum are met, and, if so, how are these decisions recorded and reported in the minutes of the public record of the council?
The Executive of General Council might agree that: in meetings of the Executive and Sub-Executive of General Council:
And the Executive of the General Council might further agree that:
It will ask The Manual Committee to provide guidance on the use of in camera sessions for the other councils of the church.